IEEE 802.11 Standards, Facts & Channels
Home :: IEEE 802.11 Standards, Facts & Channels

IEEE 802.11 Standards, Facts & Channels

 

What is 802.11?

The 802.11 standards are a group of evolving specifications defined by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Commonly referred to as Wi-Fi the 802.11 standards define a through-the-air interface between a wireless client and a base station access point or between two or more wireless clients. There are many other standards defined by the IEEE, such as the 802.3 Ethernet standard.

Why are standards important?

Standards are a set of specifications that all manufacturers must follow in order for their products to be compatible. This is important to insure interoperability between devices in the market. Standards may provide some optional requirements that individual manufacturers may or may not implement in their products.

802.11b

In 1995, the Federal Communications Commission had allocated several bands of wireless spectrum for use without a license. The FCC stipulated that the use of spread spectrum technology would be required in any devices. In 1990, the IEEE began exploring a standard. In 1997 the 802.11 standard was ratified and is now obsolete. Then in July 1999 the 802.11b standard was ratified. The 802.11 standard provides a maximum theoretical 11 Megabits per second (Mbps) data rate in the 2.4 GHz Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) band.

802.11g

In 2003, the IEEE ratified the 802.11g standard with a maximum theoretical data rate of 54 megabits per second (Mbps) in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. As signal strength weakens due to increased distance, attenuation (signal loss) through obstacles or high noise in the frequency band, the data rate automatically adjusts to lower rates (54/48/36/24/12/9/6 Mbps) to maintain the connection.

When both 802.11b and 802.11g clients are connected to an 802.11g router, the 802.11g clients will have a lower data rate. Many routers provide the option of allowing mixed 802.11b/g clients or they may be set to either 802.11b or 802.11g clients only.

To illustrate 54 Mbps, if you have DSL or cable modem service, the data rate offered typically falls from 768 Kbps (less than 1 Mbps) to 6 Mbps. Thus 802.11g offers an attractive data rate for the majority of users. The 802.11g standard is backwards compatible with the 802.11b standard. Today 802.11g is still the most commonly deployed standard.

802.11a

Ratification of 802.11a took place in 1999. The 802.11a standard uses the 5 GHz spectrum and has a maximum theoretical 54 Mbps data rate. Like in 802.11g, as signal strength weakens due to increased distance, attenuation (signal loss) through obstacles or high noise in the frequency band, the data rate automatically adjusts to lower rates (54/48/36/24/12/9/6 Mbps) to maintain the connection. The 5 GHz spectrum has higher attenuation (more signal loss) than lower frequencies, such as 2.4 GHz used in 802.11b/g standards. Penetrating walls provides poorer performance than with 2.4 GHz. Products with 802.11a are typically found in larger corporate networks or with wireless Internet service providers in outdoor backbone networks.

802.11n

In January, 2004 the IEEE 802.11 task group initiated work. The standard was finally ratified in September 2009.

The goal of 802.11n is to significantly increase the data throughput rate. While there are a number of technical changes, one important change is the addition of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) and spatial multiplexing. Multiple antennas are used in MIMO, which use multiple radios and therefore utilizes more electrical power.

802.11n will operate on both 2.4 GHz (802.11b/b) and 5 GHz (802.11a) bands. This will require significant site planning when installing 802.11n devices. The 802.11n specifications provide both 20 MHz and 40 MHz channel options versus 20 MHz channels in 802.11a and 802.11b/g standards. By bonding two adjacent 20 MHz channels, 802.11n can provide double the data rate in utilization of 40 MHz channels. However, 40 MHz in the 2.4 GHz band will result in interference and is not recommended nor likely which inhibits data throughput in the 2.4 GHz band. It is recommended to use 20 MHz channels in the 2.4 GHz spectrum like 802.11b/g utilizes. The 5 GHz spectrum band will provide be the best utilization of 802.11n technology. Deployment of 802.11n will take some planning effort in frequency and channel selection. Some 5 GHz channels must have dynamic frequency selection (DFS) technology implemented in order to utilize those particular channels.

 

 

VHT

An IEEE working group has been working on efforts for the successor to 802.11n in the last one year. This effort is known as Very High Throughput (VHT) and focuses on changing 802.11 to support 1 Gigabit per second (Gbps) wireless LAN standard.

Which standard would be best to purchase and use?

Today, you will primarily find 802.11n products in retail. The estimates show that 94% of the buyers of these products are consumers or small businesses. These purchases are driven more out of the desire to purchase the latest technology rather than buying based on an educated decision. The majority of enterprise or corporate users have not rushed into 802.11n products. AIR802 continues to poll its customers in the USA and in other countries with over 95% reporting that they have no immediate interest in 802.11n technology for their customers. Wireless professionals are concerned about the complexity of 802.11n products, higher electrical power consumption and other issues. Most report strong signal connectivity remains most important. Since current hardware for 802.11n has lower RF power output, the majority of wireless networking professionals are continuing to deploy 802.11b/g products with more powerful RF transmit power.The common consumer equipment found in retail stores have between 30 to 65 mW of RF output power. However, within the same general price range, equipment with 250 mW of RF output power or higher can be purchased. In comparison tests, high power 802.11b/g routers provide significantly greater distance and coverage and as a result higher throughput than any typical lower powered 802.11b/g or 802.11n products in the market. For most users more data throughput is not the critical decision factor. If the wireless network is being used for Internet access and the DSL or cable modem service, which is typically less than 1 Mbps to 6 Mbps depending on the service provider or plan, the typical 25 Mbps maximum data throughput on a high RF powered 802.11b/g device is more than sufficient. In fact today, thousands of networks supporting IP video surveillance are being put into place where streaming compressed video is carried over 802.11g or 802.11a networks. The reality is that 802.11b/g equipment will be in use for many, many years. Today, the bulk of equipment manufactured and sold to wireless professionals is still 802.11b/g, particularly for outdoor use.

For those few who in the near future absolutely need higher data throughput for a particular application, then 802.11n might be a consideration. The 802.11n standard provides data throughput of up to theoretical maximum of 600 Mbps. However, real world tests, where building materials and existence of other wireless signals in the frequency band have resulted in data throughput rates of as low as 26 Mbps. There is also the risk of the product being outdated in a year should the specifications change through the IEEE working group. Thus the actual performance just might not be any better or much better than a high RF powered 802.11b/g device.

If frequency interference and congestion is a significant factor, then 802.11a should be considered. However, not all client cards in computers, etc. have 802.11a capability and this should be evaluated carefully.

In summary, most consumers or small businesses would be better off without any doubt with an high RF powered 802.11b/g device for the foreseeable future.

Comparison of 802.11 LAN Standards

Standard

Maximum

Data Rate

(Mbps)

Typical

Throughput

(Mbps)

Operating

Frequency

Band

Maximum Non-Overlapping

Channels (Americas)

802.11b

11

6.5

2.4 GHz

3 *1

802.11g

54

8 (Mixed b/g)

25 (Only 802.11g)

2.4 GHz

3 *1

802.11a

54

25

5 GHz

24 (20 MHz channels)

12 (40 MHz channels)

802.11n

600 (Theoretical Max)

74 to 144 *2

2.4 GHz & 5 GHz

*3

*1 - Channels 1, 6 and 11 are the three non-overlapping channels in the Americas. Each channel is 20 MHz wide.

*2 - These are typical acheived rates. Actual throughput will depend upon various factors such as the manufacturer and model, environmental factors, whether 20 MHz or 40 MHz channels are utilized, if security is enabled and whether all clients are 802.11n or a mix of 802.11a/g/n.

*3 - For 802.11n, in the 2.4 GHz band, there are three non-overlapping 20 MHz channels or one 40 MHz channel. The use of 40 MHz is not desirable or practical in the 2.4 GHz band. However, a single 20 MHz channel could be used with lower throughput, largely defeating the gain of using 802.11n. In the 5 GHz band, twenty four non-overlapping 20 MHz or up to twelve 40 MHz channels exist.

IEEE 802.11b/g Channel Assignments

Channel

Frequency Band (GHz)

Channel Center Frequency (GHz)

FCC - Americas

ETSI (Europe)

1

2.401-2.423

2.412

X

X

2

2.406-2.428

2.417

X

X

3

2.411-2.433

2.422

X

X

4

2.416-2.438

2.427

X

X

5

2.421-2.443

2.432

X

X

6

2.426-2.448

2.437

X

X

7

2.431-2.453

2.442

X

X

8

2.436-2.458

2.447

X

X

9

2.441-2.463

2.452

X

X

10

2.446-2.468

2.457

X

X

11

2.451-2.473

2.462

X

X

12

2.456-2.478

2.467

-

X

13

2.461-2.483

2.472

-

X

14

2.473-2.495

2.484

-

-

- i   In the America's, with channels 1 through 11, there are three non-overlapping channels: 1, 6 and 11.

IEEE 802.11a Channel Assignments

Channel

Center Frequency (MHz)

Americas

ETSI (Europe)

Permitted Use Location

Other Comments

34

5170

-

-

-

 

36

5180

X

X

Indoor

 

38

5190

-

-

-

 

40

5200

X

X

Indoor

 

42

5210

-

-

-

 

44

5220

X

X

Indoor

 

46

5230

-

-

-

 

48

5240

X

X

Indoor

 

52

5260

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

56

5280

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

60

5300

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

64

5320

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

100

5500

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

104

5520

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

108

5540

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

112

5560

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

116

5580

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

120

5600

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

124

5620

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

128

5640

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

132

5660

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

136

5680

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

140

5700

X

X

Indoor or Outdoor

DFS Required

149

5745

X

-

Typical Outdoor

 

153

5765

X

-

Typical Outdoor

 

157

5785

X

-

Typical Outdoor

 

161

5805

X

-

Typical Outdoor

 

165

5825

X

-

Typical Outdoor

 

Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) is mandatory in the America's and the European (ETSI) market. Access Points (APs) must constantly monitor the frequency for radar presence. If the AP detects radar, it is required to cease all transmissions within the required time frame and dynamically move to another channel.

AIR802, LLC, Electronic Equipment & 
Supplies - Wholesale & Manufacturers, Naperville, IL UL intertek View AIR802 profile on Ariba Discovery
1981 D Wiesbrook Drive
Oswego, IL 60543 USA
Tel: +1 (630) 966-2501

sales@air802.com

 

http://www.air802.com - AIR802 manufactures professional, reliable and high quality wireless and cable products. You may source our products direct or through distributors and resellers. Our wireless products include Wi-Fi antennas, cellular antennas, antenna cable assemblies-jumpers-pigtails, bulk coax cable, bulk Ethernet CAT5e and CAT6 cable, CAT6 Ethernet patch cords, fiber optic patch cords, power-over-Ethernet (PoE) injectors and splitters, wireless access points or routers, gigabit switches and coaxial connnectors.
http://www.air802.com covers USA, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Columbia, Peru, Argentina, Brazil, UK, Australia.